| dc.creator |
Shaw, Scott |
|
| dc.date |
1995 |
|
| dc.date |
2005-11-23T12:21:34Z |
|
| dc.date |
2005-11-23T12:21:34Z |
|
| dc.date |
1995 |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2022-05-09T10:17:10Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2022-05-09T10:17:10Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/1826/194 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://reports.aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/194 |
|
| dc.description |
Implicit methods for the calculation of unsteady flows require the solution of
large, sparse non-symmetric systems of linear equations. The size of such systems
makes their solution by direct methods impractical and consequently iterative
techniques are often used. A popular class of such methods are those based upon the
conjugate gradient method. In this paper we examine three such methods, CGS,
restarted GMRES and restarted GMRESR and compare their convergence properties. |
|
| dc.description |
The University |
|
| dc.format |
1963 bytes |
|
| dc.format |
895587 bytes |
|
| dc.format |
text/plain |
|
| dc.format |
application/pdf |
|
| dc.language |
en_UK |
|
| dc.relation |
College of Aeronautics Report;9504 |
|
| dc.relation |
CU/CoA/R;9504 |
|
| dc.title |
Comparison if the convergence behaviour of three linear solvers for large, sparse unsymmetric matrices |
|
| dc.type |
Technical Report |
|